I have always loved entertainment media, so it surprised no one in 1975 when I declared Radio-Television-Film as my major.
I minored in Journalism. This was also unsurprising, as writing was the one skill I acquired in school that came rather easily to me. As a kid, one of my favorite toys was a little rubber stamp "printing press," which I used to publish a "newspaper" circulated among our immediate family and friends.
And don't forget that this was the Watergate era. J-schools were filling up with idealistic young students like me, who looked upon Woodward and Bernstein as heroes.
By this time, my transfer from UCLA to CSUN was permanent (although I did not realize it for another couple of years). We were fortunate that our faculty included a number of working reporters from local station KNBC... and the Los Angeles Times.
We did have a couple of other papers in the area, including the Los Angeles Herald Examiner and the Van Nuys-based Daily News (which at the time was owned by the Chicago Tribune). But for all intents and purposes, L.A. was -- and remains -- a one-newspaper town. And, as you will see on "Inventing LA," tonight's edition of POV on PBS, the fortunes of the city and its newspaper have been intertwined for more than a century.
This is must-viewing for anyone with an interest in the history of our region and how it came to be.
"Inventing LA" was one of the programs showcased at the PBS press tour back in August, and one of the ones I was most looking forward to. It recalls a period in history when newspapers were nothing less than the lifeblood of the community (which may be hard for younger audiences to fathom, now that the Internet has democratized and globalized news gathering).
But the history of the newspaper isn't just a story about media, or even of a city -- and might make for very dry viewing. What sets this documentary apart is its focus on the heirs of founder Harrison Gray Otis and his son-in-law, Harry Chandler... and is a fascinating portrait of a real-life "Dynasty." For all of the 20th Century, the Chandlers were the most powerful family in Los Angeles. The documentary tells the very personal story of the simultaneous rise of the city and the paper -- and the family feud sparked by third generation publisher Otis Chandler's quest to remake their publication into a paper of record. Otis succeeded, but in the end, the family voted to sell the jewel of their corporate crown to the Tribune Company. It has never been the same.
The documentary features interviews with several family members and former Times employees, including Otis' son Harry Brant Chandler and Tom Johnston, who replaced Otis as publisher in 1980. Both were present to answer reporters' questions at the PBS Press tour.
According to Harry, the documentary (which actually premiered earlier this year at the Santa Barbara Film Festival) "caused a few earthquakes in the family, but nothing that wasn’t anticipated."
Harry spoke about his father's legacy: "He served well for 20 years as publisher but another side of him had a Harley Davidson heart and he wanted to have his own life. He got tired of fighting the family. I think he finally had enough and stopped fighting. He left and surprised a lot of people."
Tom Johnson agreed with that assessment. "I regret very deeply that Otis allowed himself to be pushed aside," he said. "I think he could have kept the paper from being sold."
One of the final questions concerned the paper's legacy: Would Los Angeles have been better off if there had been no Chandlers?
Johnson: "I think in many ways this would still be a desert without the Chandlers... Without the power of the Chandlers and the Times and all the interconnectedness, Southern California would not be what it is today with its great strengths as well as weaknesses."
DISCLOSURE: I do not consider myself a journalist. I did not tape record the press conference in August, so quotes above were taken from my fast notes... and while I believe I came home with a pretty accurate impression of the panelists' answers, they are not a word-for-word transcription.
I did not promise PBS I would write a post about this program and did not receive any monetary compensation for it. As someone with an interest in local history (and a rather large collection of books about Los Angeles), I found the subject matter fascinating and having viewed it already on a screener supplied by PBS, I think it lives up to its promise and is worthy of sharing here.








For Local Blog




Recent Comments